Find out how The Garden Law Firm can help you today!
Kevin is on the Board of the National Forest Recreation Association. He has appeared before numerous federal district courts in litigation of government claims and federal land management issues. Contact Kevin to find out how he can help you.
Contact Kevin Today
Forest Service Grazing Permittee Potentially Liable For Injuries To Cyclist Caused By Predator Control Dogs
Your Government counsel.™
A court recently held that a permittee which held a Term Grazing Permit with the Forest Service was not protected from liability for injuries its predator control dogs caused to a cyclist. The court’s ruling hinged on its interpretation of the rights held under Forest Service grazing permits. The permittees are ranchers whose permit allows them to graze sheep within the White River National Forest. A cyclist who was participating in a permitted bike race sustained serious injuries when she was attacked by the permittees’ predatory control dogs. The permittees argued that the cyclist was a trespasser under Colorado’s Premises Liability Act which prevented the cyclist from asserting common law theories of liability. They also argued that, while Colorado had a dog bite statute, they were not subject to strict liability under that law because they fell under the working dog exemption.
Focusing on the legal rights provided under a Forest Service grazing permit, the court concluded that the permit demonstrated that the permittees, by accepting the permit, consented to the cyclist’s entry onto the property covered by the permit. The court noted that a grazing permit does not confer a right to exclude others from the area covered by the permit. The court also concluded that, because the cyclist was participating in a race authorized by a Forest Service permit, she was a licensee for purposes of the Colorado law. The court also found that the grazing permit was “merely a revocable privilege that creates no property interest in the federal land it covers.” Because the grazing permit gave the permit holders a very limited interest in the use of the federal land and was revocable, the court concluded that their dogs were not working on their property. Therefore, the exemption under the Colorado dog bite statute for dogs working on the property of their owners did not apply.
Share this post
Subscribe to the mailing list
Find out how The Garden Law Firm can help you today!
Temporary Reprieve From Wildfire Insurance Coverage For Forest Service Campground and Day Use Permits
The US Forest Service recently issued a letter asking Regional Foresters to consider requests from holders of campground and day use permits for a one
Forest Service Cancels Campground Prospectus After Erroneously Listing It As A Small Business Set-Aside
The Forest Service recently decided to withdraw a prospectus for a campground permit after the agency had “mistakenly marked” the prospectus as a small business
Forest Service Revises Solicitation For Helicopter Wildfire Support In Light Of Protest
The Forest Service recently cancelled a solicitation for helicopter wildfire support and agreed to review its documentation justifying its proposed evaluation method in light of
Categories
Archives