Find out how The Garden Law Firm can help you today!
Kevin is on the Board of the National Forest Recreation Association. He has appeared before numerous federal district courts in litigation of government claims and federal land management issues. Contact Kevin to find out how he can help you.
Contact Kevin Today
Forest Service Held In Contempt For Relying On Banned Report
Your Government counsel.™
In a case brought by the North American Packgoat Association, among others, a Court recently held the Forest Service in contempt of court and awarded attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs based on the agency having relied on a report which the Court had previously prohibited the agency from using. The two reports discussed the risk of domestic goats and sheep transmitting disease to bighorn sheep. The Court disagreed with the Forest Service, finding that the agency had in fact relied on the banned report in its more recent report.
The first report, prepared in 2006, addressed the risk of domestic goats and sheep transmitting disease to bighorn sheep on the Payette National Forest. In 2009, a court ruled that the 2006 report was prepared in violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and prohibited the Forest Service from relying on its conclusions. In 2012, the Forest Service prepared another report on the same issue on the Shoshone National Forest and cited to and quoted from the 2006 report. The plaintiffs claimed that, in doing so, the Forest Service had violated the 2009 court order. The Forest Service responded that the portions of the 2006 report which it quoted did not contain conclusions and that, regardless, there was a substantial amount of scientific literature supporting the conclusions which it reached in the 2012 report.
The Court disagreed with the agency, finding that the Forest Service did rely upon the conclusions in the 2006 report and never cited to a single new source. Therefore, the Court held that the agency was in contempt of court for violating the prior court order and ordered the agency to pay appropriate attorney’s fees of the plaintiff. The Court did not, however, invalidate the 2012 report because the Shoshone National Forest was in a different state but instead scheduled a hearing with the parties to discuss the resolution of that issue.
Share this post
Subscribe to the mailing list
Find out how The Garden Law Firm can help you today!
Temporary Reprieve From Wildfire Insurance Coverage For Forest Service Campground and Day Use Permits
The US Forest Service recently issued a letter asking Regional Foresters to consider requests from holders of campground and day use permits for a one
Forest Service Cancels Campground Prospectus After Erroneously Listing It As A Small Business Set-Aside
The Forest Service recently decided to withdraw a prospectus for a campground permit after the agency had “mistakenly marked” the prospectus as a small business
Forest Service Revises Solicitation For Helicopter Wildfire Support In Light Of Protest
The Forest Service recently cancelled a solicitation for helicopter wildfire support and agreed to review its documentation justifying its proposed evaluation method in light of
Categories
Archives